<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/css/rss20.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:pheedo="http://www.pheedo.com/namespace/pheedo">
	<channel>
		<title>dot.comments</title>
		<link>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/</link>
		<ttl>15</ttl>
		<description>A blog about comments, journalism and stuff on washingtonpost.com by Doug Feaver.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:36:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.21-en</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<item>
			<title>Public option: Good policy or evil plot?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers fulminate about the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/22/AR2009112202229.html">"public option"</a> in the health-care reform bill the Senate agreed to debate.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=1a7d46163b38134de9a3765cd28f433d&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=1a7d46163b38134de9a3765cd28f433d&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=1a7d46163b38134de9a3765cd28f433d</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/is_the_public_option_evil.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/is_the_public_option_evil.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:36:40 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>In love with Twilight</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate the literary merit (and other issues) about the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/18/AR2009111804145.html">Twilight book series</a> and its upcoming second movie.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=4a7dc2d6b5b416ce1a4a30362b68a48c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=4a7dc2d6b5b416ce1a4a30362b68a48c&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=4a7dc2d6b5b416ce1a4a30362b68a48c</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/in_love_with_twilight.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/in_love_with_twilight.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:30:44 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Readers pan Obama, polls, each other</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate what to do in Afghanistan as they dissect a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111703090.html">new poll</a> that finds a majority of Americans confident Obama will select a strategy that works.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=88e1e487ffb72f0b75ace52d7fb2423c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=88e1e487ffb72f0b75ace52d7fb2423c&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=88e1e487ffb72f0b75ace52d7fb2423c</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/readers_pan_polls_obama_each_o.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/readers_pan_polls_obama_each_o.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:19:04 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Health-care reform kills jobs?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate U.S. Chamber's planned study opposing <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/15/AR2009111503159.html">health-care reform</a>.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=9b0f2778cccc83af43d4d204bfb95be0&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=9b0f2778cccc83af43d4d204bfb95be0&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=9b0f2778cccc83af43d4d204bfb95be0</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/health-care_kills_jobs.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/health-care_kills_jobs.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:15:48 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does Obama measure up as Commander in Chief?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[President Obama's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/11/AR2009111127507.html">performance as Commander in Chief</a> is getting bad reviews from many readers.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=9b202c52ead0556a07cee33bf40a7609&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=9b202c52ead0556a07cee33bf40a7609&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=9b202c52ead0556a07cee33bf40a7609</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/does_obama_have_what_it_takes.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/does_obama_have_what_it_takes.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:25:43 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Execution incites death penalty debate</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate death penalty after <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/10/AR2009111001396.html">execution</a> of sniper John Allen Muhammad.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=871ccf2e99f4525a141e612407333c43&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=871ccf2e99f4525a141e612407333c43&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=871ccf2e99f4525a141e612407333c43</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/execution_incites_death_penalt.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/execution_incites_death_penalt.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:36:10 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Abortion to the fore on health care reform</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate whether <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/08/AR2009110818453.html">federal health-care legislation</a> should prohibit funding of abortion.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=ba2848b4bf827651484729b80acdb9db&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=ba2848b4bf827651484729b80acdb9db&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=ba2848b4bf827651484729b80acdb9db</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/post_15.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/post_15.html</guid>
			<category>Abortion</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:08:08 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Readers spin Tuesday&apos;s elections</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers debate the political future for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/04/AR2009110404833.html">Democrats</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/04/AR2009110402752.html">Republicans</a>.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/its_either_about_jobs_or_ideology.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/its_either_about_jobs_or_ideology.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:17:21 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Featured Advertiser]]></title>
			<link>http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec&amp;p=4</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec&amp;p=4"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=a9dc68a8282d8b0379e3eee60ee216ec&amp;p=4"/></a>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:17:21 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Readers debate election damage</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers dissect <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/03/AR2009110304333.html">Republican victories</a> in Virginia and New Jersey.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=c132a10cc721388be444f6e6712dede3&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=c132a10cc721388be444f6e6712dede3&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=c132a10cc721388be444f6e6712dede3</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/democrats_helped_or_hurt.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/democrats_helped_or_hurt.html</guid>
			<category>Democrats</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:17:25 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No partisan climate change on warming bill</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers argue about <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/01/AR2009110102593.html">climate change legislation</a>, which needs Republican votes to pass.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=129f581ac3fda7d195d87977bc347d8c&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=129f581ac3fda7d195d87977bc347d8c&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=129f581ac3fda7d195d87977bc347d8c</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/politics_global_warming_nuclear_power.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/11/politics_global_warming_nuclear_power.html</guid>
			<category>Global Warming</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:15:46 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Readers decry another Afghan study</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers oppose <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/28/AR2009102804490.html">another study of Afghanistan</a> before President Obama makes a decision about how to proceed with the war.
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f2fea115ccedf775113d29fa74deb1a6&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f2fea115ccedf775113d29fa74deb1a6&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=f2fea115ccedf775113d29fa74deb1a6</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/readers_decry_another_afghan_study.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/readers_decry_another_afghan_study.html</guid>
			<category>Afghanistan</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:38:32 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Can economic growth continue?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers worry about whether federal efforts <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/27/AR2009102704120.html">will keep economy going</a>.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=1bca2c9fc40d25b6710d432fdcfb6d85&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=1bca2c9fc40d25b6710d432fdcfb6d85&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=1bca2c9fc40d25b6710d432fdcfb6d85</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/can_economic_growth_continue.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/can_economic_growth_continue.html</guid>
			<category>Economy Watch</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:12:42 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Obama Dithering on Afghanistan?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers argue about whether Pentagon  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502633.html">war game evaluation</a> is just more Obama dithering on Afghanistan.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=057ddb222cbf95643035addd5dbbda1b&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=057ddb222cbf95643035addd5dbbda1b&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=057ddb222cbf95643035addd5dbbda1b</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/is_obama_dithering_on_afghanis.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/is_obama_dithering_on_afghanis.html</guid>
			<category>Afghanistan</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:36:03 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What&apos;s worse? Swine flu or vaccine?</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Some Readers are among the many Americans who a polls shows are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/21/AR2009102103857.html">wary of the swine flu vaccine</a>.
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=5a75e0be36c5e732956c8e038685d040&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=5a75e0be36c5e732956c8e038685d040&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=5a75e0be36c5e732956c8e038685d040</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/whats_worse_swine_flu_or_vacci.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/whats_worse_swine_flu_or_vacci.html</guid>
			<category></category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:20:36 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Split opinions on Afghanistan policy</title>
			<description><![CDATA[Readers <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/20/AR2009102003780.html">deeply divided</a> over whether the United States should send more troops to Afghanistan.<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/>
<a href="http://ads.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=089ed4373776c766b49f5504dbf10173&p=1"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=089ed4373776c766b49f5504dbf10173&p=1"/></a>
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.rfihub.com/eus.gif?eui=2223"/>]]></description>
			<author>dot.comments</author>
			<link>http://feeds.voices.washingtonpost.com/click.phdo?i=089ed4373776c766b49f5504dbf10173</link>
			<pheedo:origLink>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/split_opinions_on_afghanistan_policy.html?wprss=dot.comments</pheedo:origLink>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dot.comments/2009/10/split_opinions_on_afghanistan_policy.html</guid>
			<category>Afghanistan</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:44:16 -0500</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>